SEO Images? The ALT Tag Is Not Enough!

Hello! Surely when heard the phrase SEO image then I guess is 100% guaranteed everyone will think of the ALT tag. Yes! ALT tags in images is a very important factor to determine image ranking on Google. So as to know the search engines are not able to understand one picture description of what we understand only 1 image via HTML elements and attributes related. In the second image is the most important card Title card (when describing users hover over the image) and ALT (this card describes the search engine with the keywords contained in it).


So SEO wants to top 1 Google image ALT tags only?

According to his research, survey and evaluation of a number of keywords related to the image is not so true. There are image ALT tags, but ranked very low, but the images do not have ALT tags have a higher ranking. So where is the reason?

The determinants of an image ranking

1. Filename containing the keyword (iphone-5.jpg, smartphone.jpg ...)
2. ALT tags in images containing keywords need SEO
3. The Web page's Meta tags contain keywords need SEO
4. URLs contain keywords
5. Title card of images containing keywords need SEO
6. The visual keywords surrounded by other HTML tags
7. The keywords are repeated in the relative content articles
8. Beautiful pictures, strange, sharp, fast load
9. Written content and unique article SEO standards ...

Above is the experience and judgment of your SEO actual image, the important factor and full picture of your help rank high on Google for your reference.

Also you do not have any optimization is able to get top Google because it depends a lot of other important factors such as: The Trust website, Pagerank, life domain, the DA, PA, Traffic, web page good SEO Onpage, SEO articles standard ...

Author

Written by Mai

Hello everyone, My name is Mai, I'm an Internet Marketer, I thank you when you visit my blog. Hopefully what I know will help you. If there is something lacking, you can comment with me, every word of your comment, I sincerely thank you..

0 comments: